25 September
2014
By Caitlin
Virtue
The story of
baby Gammy, and the ramifications it has had for Australians seeking a baby by
surrogate in Thailand, is fuelling much debate about the international and
domestic options available to Australians pursuing parenthood.
This blog
exists to explore how the rights of the child can best be protected
while satisfying the desires of Western couples unable to naturally conceive a
baby.

Baby Gammy in Thailand. Photo: Sky
Commercial surrogacy is outlawed in Australia, yet there are
hundreds of babies produced every year for Australian couples at overseas
clinics. Following the Thai government’s crackdown on surrogacy services,
Australian couples are continuing to seek surrogates in India, and looking
to new frontiers such as Mexico and Nepal.
The
exchange of money is justified in overseas surrogacy arrangements as compensation
for the surrogate mother’s services, essentially renting her womb to people
seeking a baby.
While
buying a baby may remedy the emotional response felt by people who cannot
naturally conceive, there is no right to be a parent. The concept of parental
rights only comes into play once a child exists, and fundamentally the notion
refers to the right of parents to raise their child as they see fit.
Despite someone
being in a financial position where they can afford to pay for a baby through
commercial surrogacy, a child should never be bought and sold. The
practice reduces children and the woman’s uterus to be commodities, in a
transaction that promotes exploitation.
Gammy was apparently abandoned due to his Down syndrome – He was an
imperfect product. Even more disturbing, his Australian father is a
convicted paedophile.
Australia’s National Children’s Commissioner, Megan Mitchell, argues it
is not unrealistic to consider determined predators will use surrogacy as a
method to procure access to children.
In 2013, Australian citizen, Mark J. Newton, was sentenced to 40years in an American
prison for sexually abusing a boy he adopted via surrogacy. Newton
and his long-term boyfriend Peter Truong,
started abusing the boy days after his birth and over six years they travelled
the world to offer him to an international syndicate of paedophiles.
![]() |
Newton, right, with Truong and their son. Photo: ABC |
More recently, a New South Wales man was charged in September with
sexually abusing his twin daughters born to a surrogate in Thailand.
It cannot be denied that payment for surrogacy
creates a market for a life, of which the mere existence is an abuse of human
rights. Prospective parents and national, state and international leaders should
no longer ignore the reality of a baby trade, accessed by anyone with enough
money.
Further reading
Australian
Government: Rights of parents and children, W n.d., viewed 11 October 2014,
<http://www.ag.gov.au/RightsAndProtections/HumanRights/PublicSectorGuidanceSheets/Pages/Rightsofparentsandchildren.aspx>.
Browne,
R 2014, Australian
parents turn to Mexico as Thailand tightens surrogacy laws, viewed 11 October 2014, <http://www.smh.com.au/world/australian-parents-turn-to-mexico-as-thailand-tightens-surrogacy-laws-20140807-101e3n.html#ixzz3DZEmGCAA>.
News.com: Thousands of Australians paying
for surrogacy in India and Thailand,
viewed 11 October 2014, <http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/thousands-of-infertile-australians-paying-for-surrogacy-in-india-and-thailand/story-fnet08xa-1226872653386>.
Ralston,
D 2013, Named: the
Australian paedophile jailed for 40 years, viewed 11 October
2014,<http://www.smh.com.au/national/named-the-australian-paedophile-jailed-for-40-years-20130630-2p5da.html>.
No comments:
Post a Comment